\n\nAs expected (if you frequent Nikon Rumors, as I do) Nikon announced the 36MP D800 last night. In case you're worried that 36MP is too many, it's still slightly under the D7000's pixel density, and well under the NEX-7's pixel density, and both get perfectly acceptable low light performance.\n\nSo basically here's the situation (from the point of view of a Nikon shooter).\n
\n\t- D7000 — 800g, 16MP DX, 6FPS, ISO 100-6400 native
\n\t- D400 — ???
\n\t- D700 — 1kg, 12MP, 5MP DX, 5FPS (8FPS with battery grip), ISO 200-6400 native
\n\t- D800 — 900g, 36MP, 15MP DX, 4FPS (6FPS DX), ISO 100-6400 native
\n\t- D4 — 1.34kg, 16MP, 11fps, ISO 100-12800 native (but probably scary good even when pushing beyond)
\n
\nThis doesn't include anything about video since the D800/D4 is a no-brainer, so it's just a question of stills. The only case where the D700 edges out the D800 is if you're trying to use the D700 as a \"poor man's D3\" to shoot sports. Even in this case, I suspect you'd probably prefer 15MP DX at 6FPS with a deeper buffer and greater reach. There are probably some edge cases arguing for the D700, but none that would impact me. The D800, or to be more specific, the D800E is a no-brainer. (Why the D800E? Because there's no reason to expect software moire-reduction to be any worse than a blurry filter, and a good deal of reason to expect it to be better. It does bug me to pay $300 extra to have something left out though.)\n\nAnother question is how much of a low light edge the D4 will have over intelligent resampling of 36MP RAW files to 16MP. (Does the D800 do RAW files at lower resolution?) Noise is basically statistical sampling error, and if you're increasing the number of samples by a factor of two you'd expect\n\nAs a Nikon DX shooter, the last two lenses I bought have been FX — I've been assuming my next body would be FX for some time. The beauty of the D800 is that it promises to be just as good a DX camera as the D7000 while having the additional benefit of offering FX. This makes the switch to FX a lot less painful for people with an investment in DX, and was probably part of Nikon's equation when deciding on the D800 feature set.\n\nEqually interesting is that we now have a big gap between the ~$1000 D7000 and the $3000 D800. My guess is that the D400 will have a new sensor or some other edge over the D7000 beyond build, FPS, and shooting buffer to justify its ~$1800 price tag.\n So, while I wait for the digital Rollei 35 to ship, probably around 2015, this could be the last \"big\" camera I ever buy.
","$updatedAt":"2024-06-05T09:10:30.275+00:00",path:"full-frame-or-bust-part-2",_created:"2024-07-09T20:29:43.989Z",id:"4674",_modified:"2024-07-09T20:29:43.989Z","$id":"4674",_path:"post/path=full-frame-or-bust-part-2"},"page/path=blog":{path:"blog",css:"",imageUrl:"",prefetch:[{regexp:"^\\/(([\\w\\d]+\\/)*)([\\w-]+)\\/?$",path:"post/path=[3]"}],tags:["public"],source:"",title:"",description:"",_path:"page/path=blog"}}