\n\nI'm eagerly waiting to hand Apple some money for a new Macbook Pro—my old one is over three years old and has a few nasty dents in it. Worst of all, it only has 3GB of RAM and 128MB of VRAM (my first computer had 1kB of RAM, but today 3GB is barely adequate).\n\nLong ago I promised myself never to \"upgrade\" a machine unless it's flat out broken or the replacement will be at least twice as fast. Unfortunately, my Macbook Pro is neither broken nor significantly slower than today's top-of-the-line model (3.06GHz Core 2 Duo).\n\nIt's pretty bad, I've been going to Dell and Lenovo configuring their high-end models and contemplating a switch to Windows 7... Well, not really. Every time I've bought a fast PC thinking I could live with it as my main machine it's ended up as a really expensive games console. Oddly enough, maxed out Lenovo (Thinkpad W510) notebooks aren't really competitive with Apple Macbook Pros anyway (well, the imaginary ones that we assume Apple will introduce shortly) while Dell's offerings are both expensive and lame.\n\nIf anything the iPad makes this worse. I'm going to need something to develop iPad apps on, and I'm sick of syncing projects between my Mac Pro (which I hardly use any more) and my Macbook Pro (it's fine for web development, since I keep everything in the cloud, but it does not work so well at all for Unity stuff). What I want is one machine to rule them all and in the darkness bind them. And a (prospective) Core i7 MacBook Pro—ideally with a 1GB video card—is that machine.\n\nUnlike five years ago, notebooks aren't obsolete in 12 months (as my over-three-year-old 2.26GHz Core 2 Duo model loudly attests) and they aren't significantly behind desktops in performance (although getting maxed out GPUs in laptops is often problematic—which may turn out to be a serious issue). When I started iPhone development, everything was tied to my Mac Pro. Now, I'd like it all to be tied to my Macbook Pro, but if I'm going to move all my stuff onto one machine, it needs to be a machine with some headroom, and 3GB is the big problem. Well, that and the dents.\n\nOne of the things I really like about the new unibody Macbooks is that -- unlike the Ti- and Al-book \"tin cans\" -- they're tough. If Apple would just remove the optical drives they'd be perfect.\n\nOne final note: I've kept to my promise since buying my 7300/180 (it was a lame \"upgrade\" over my 7500/120 which led me to my promise) -- e.g. my last upgrade were from Power Mac (2 x 1GHz G4) to Mac Pro (4 x 2.66GHz), and from 1.25 GHz G4 iBook to Macbook Pro. It's sad to think that the only way a new quad core Macbook Pro will actually be 2x faster than the current model is if I put an SSD in it or only consider RAM-hungry applications. In the end, it may be worth waiting for Macbook Pros with 1GB+ video cards.","$updatedAt":"2024-06-05T09:23:44.968+00:00",path:"back-to-basics-where-are-the-quad-core-macbook-pros-",_created:"2024-07-09T20:31:16.439Z",id:"2469",_modified:"2024-07-09T20:31:16.439Z","$id":"2469",_path:"post/path=back-to-basics-where-are-the-quad-core-macbook-pros-"},"page/path=blog":{path:"blog",css:"",imageUrl:"",prefetch:[{regexp:"^\\/(([\\w\\d]+\\/)*)([\\w-]+)\\/?$",path:"post/path=[3]"}],tags:["public"],source:"",title:"",description:"",_path:"page/path=blog"}}