<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kindle Deathwatch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loewald.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071</link>
	<description>tonio loewald&#039;s thoughts on usability, programming, games, and other stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:13:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonio</title>
		<link>http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071&#038;cpage=1#comment-4043</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 14:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071#comment-4043</guid>
		<description>I have just received correspondence from the man himself (Powell, not Littlemore) and his version of events (unsurprisingly) is different. First, note that he got the name of the iPad right, so he was probably violating an NDA or had snuck in to a factory and not talking out his ass, but this was not the point of his message.

The key issue he has is with accusations of plagiarism, which he says was perpetrated by another journalist while he was on vacation (ie someone else published plagiarized articles under his byline while he was on leave) and that Littlemore based his entire (very nasty) piece on information provided by one person.

I do not have a recording of the show in question, but Littlemore&#039;s pieces were built on pieces taken from the public record — he would simply show articles, with portions highlighted, on screen. In this case they showed pieces in the SMH with Powell&#039;s byline juxtaposed with earlier articles published under other bylines. It was, apparently cut and dried.

I don&#039;t know how newspapers work. Powell&#039;s version seems plausible — except that as I recall he left the SMH the next day.

In essence, however, the thrust is that Powell&#039;s articles, with the exception of those posted in his absence, were his own. So, from my point of view, an idiot but not a plagiarist.

He was dead on about the name, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just received correspondence from the man himself (Powell, not Littlemore) and his version of events (unsurprisingly) is different. First, note that he got the name of the iPad right, so he was probably violating an NDA or had snuck in to a factory and not talking out his ass, but this was not the point of his message.</p>
<p>The key issue he has is with accusations of plagiarism, which he says was perpetrated by another journalist while he was on vacation (ie someone else published plagiarized articles under his byline while he was on leave) and that Littlemore based his entire (very nasty) piece on information provided by one person.</p>
<p>I do not have a recording of the show in question, but Littlemore&#8217;s pieces were built on pieces taken from the public record — he would simply show articles, with portions highlighted, on screen. In this case they showed pieces in the SMH with Powell&#8217;s byline juxtaposed with earlier articles published under other bylines. It was, apparently cut and dried.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how newspapers work. Powell&#8217;s version seems plausible — except that as I recall he left the SMH the next day.</p>
<p>In essence, however, the thrust is that Powell&#8217;s articles, with the exception of those posted in his absence, were his own. So, from my point of view, an idiot but not a plagiarist.</p>
<p>He was dead on about the name, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonio Loewald</title>
		<link>http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071&#038;cpage=1#comment-3099</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonio Loewald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071#comment-3099</guid>
		<description>Going through old blog posts, it appears that Powell was right and so was Business Week about the name!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going through old blog posts, it appears that Powell was right and so was Business Week about the name!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tonio</title>
		<link>http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071&#038;cpage=1#comment-2360</link>
		<dc:creator>Tonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071#comment-2360</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, I&#039;ll correct the article. Memory plays tricks blah blah blah. (Thank goodness really, since he was (is) terrible.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, I&#8217;ll correct the article. Memory plays tricks blah blah blah. (Thank goodness really, since he was (is) terrible.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malkie</title>
		<link>http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071&#038;cpage=1#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>Malkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...you need to check your facts. Powell was never the Editor-in-Chief of The Sydney Morning Herald just the &quot;editor&quot; of the Travel section and the Computer section - in other words, a staff journalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;you need to check your facts. Powell was never the Editor-in-Chief of The Sydney Morning Herald just the &#8220;editor&#8221; of the Travel section and the Computer section &#8211; in other words, a staff journalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who is he, and what is he on about? &#171; Distinguishable From Magic</title>
		<link>http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071&#038;cpage=1#comment-1937</link>
		<dc:creator>Who is he, and what is he on about? &#171; Distinguishable From Magic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 02:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loewald.com/blog/?p=1071#comment-1937</guid>
		<description>[...] Gareth Powell is something of a bete noir of many in IT in Australia. This gives some background on it. Or you can try looking up the FAQ for aus.flame.gareth-powell. I was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gareth Powell is something of a bete noir of many in IT in Australia. This gives some background on it. Or you can try looking up the FAQ for aus.flame.gareth-powell. I was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
